We’ve been helping companies use NPS® for more than 10 years. In that time we’ve tried lots of different approaches and seen first hand what works … and what doesn’t.
This post is the distillation of that 10 years of Net Promoter Score® implementation experience with organisations of different sizes and shapes.
These are the factors we have found to be consistently important regardless of company size, industry and other variables.
If you follow these rules you will:
- Implement with speed
- Implement with confidence
- Reduce implementation risk
- Virtually guarantee increased value for your business
In this post there are lots links to other blog posts, both on this site and elsewhere. If I tried to put all of the content into this one post it would be more like a book than the focused list I wanted to present. But I’ve put them in so you have a link to more information as needed.
I’ve also split the points into three groups:
- Essential: if you don’t execute on these ideas you will not generate value and the process will fail, probably within 12 months.
- Good to have: these items are not critical but if you do them you will generate more value and sooner than if you do not.
- Irrelevant: these items seem like they must be important, but they’re not and they just waste your time. Knowing what not to do is just as important as knowing what to do.
Insight #1 – Essential: Practice complete transparency of customer feedback information[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Essential Insight #1: Practice complete transparency of customer feedback.” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
The more you hide the your customer feedback data the more cynical your staff will be about the process.
I’m often challenged by executives that are concerned about sharing this data because of the potential for damaging remarks by respondents, and the effect it may have on staff.
This concern, while real, is overstated.
There will be times when you need to censor raw customer feedback due to profanity or other impropriety. In our experience this is a very very rare event.
The benefit of sharing the data far outweighs the isolated issues that you might face.
So throw open the doors to the data and share it with all staff. You will be rewarded.
Insight #2 – Essential: Do not give front line staff personal goals[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Essential Insight #2: Do not give front line staff personal goals.” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
In my opinion, giving front-line (and first level) staff personal or team NPS goals has done more harm to more NPS and customer feedback programs that any other single factor.
Signs like those below may seem mildly disconcerting but the reality is much worse. They destroy the value of the data being collected and the initiative of staff.
Yes, you do need to provide the organisation with targets for NPS but the best way to do that is company wide with an across the board bonus that all staff either receive or do not receive.
If you’re hoping NPS is a fancy new way to look over the shoulder of your staff to ensure they are doing the right thing; that hope is forlorn. Using it that way only leads to misinformation.
My recent post: It’s time to stop giving people Net Promoter Score® targets generated more interaction and feedback than any other post in the last few years. I think, because many people recognise the problems it has caused.
Insight #3 – Essential: Implement change management from day one[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Essential Insight #3: Implement change management from day one” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
My first degree is Mechanical Engineering and, early in my career as an engineer, I never really understood the need for change management. You simply, logically, explain to people what needs to be done and why and they do it.
I could not have been more wrong.
Change management is an essential part of the launch of NPS. People at all levels of the organisation have predictable fears and uncertainties when you roll out change.
Change management simply recognises that reality and allows you to pro-actively address those concerns to ease those fears and promote success.
It doesn’t have to be complex and it can be fun but it does need to be done.
Insight #4 – Essential: Have a bias for acting on what you hear[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Essential Insight #4: Have a bias for acting on what you hear” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
Sending surveys, graphing results and writing pretty reports are great fun but, as Jack Welch says, implement like hell.
For example, I was speaking with one of our customers, Justin Hodgson (Marketing Director at Manheim) who has implemented NPS in just the last 10 months. He was excited by what they had done. Among other things, he told me…
We had a goal of 2 improvement projects in the first year and we have 17 already…
The enthusiasm his company has garnered in the period since launch is enhanced, and enhances, success by doing something with the data.
It doesn’t have to be complex. Justin ran the very simple 5 Whys Process and involved people from across the organisation.
Insight #5 – Good to Have: Focus on the process not the score[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score – Good to Have – Insight #5: Focus on the process not the score” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
Sounds odd to urge you not to focus on the score when the metric is called Net Promoter Score. Odd but true.
If you focus your reporting on the process and not the score you will be more successful long term.
Insight #6 – Good to Have: Service recovery drives retention and company culture[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Insight #6: Service recovery drives retention and company culture” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
Service recovery is the act of calling unhappy customers, i.e low survey scores, and resolving whatever drove them to provide a low score.
This simple task is a powerful driver of NPS program success for many reasons. The big two are:
- Staff see action being taken, which drives essential cultural change
- It lifts NPS by 10 points across the board.
Insight #7: External Benchmarking is not as important as you think[easy-tweet tweet=”Net Promoter Score Insight #7: External Benchmarking is not as important as you think” user=”genroe” hashtags=”netpromoter, nps, voc”]
It is easily the most common question I receive when presenting to senior executive teams:
What is a good score and what should be we trying to achieve?
It is also, easily, the least important thing on which they should focus.
I’m not alone in this opinion, Rob Markey, co-creator of Net Promoter agrees and so do other industry experts.
The allure of knowing you’re the best, or the worst, is strong but the benefit pales compared to the value of driving improvement in your own score month on month.