Taking Action

3 Ways to Determine what Might be Important to a customer

Your customer loyalty survey is only as good as the list of attributes it asks about — miss the things that matter to customers and the data is quietly wrong. Here are three ways to build that "big list" properly, drawing on staff knowledge, desk research and customers themselves, so the survey collects feedback on what actually moves loyalty.

By Adam Ramshaw 4 min read
3 Ways to Determine what Might be Important to a customer

In the customer loyalty survey process, one of the keys is to make sure that your survey addresses all of the product and service attributes that are important to your customers. Seems simple and logical, doesn’t it? But as they always say, it’s not always as easy as it seems.

Determining what is important to a customer is the subject of a recent post in this blog. And to determine what should go into that list of “potentially important” things is the subject of this blog item. These potentially important areas are the source material for the questions in your survey and are very important.

Getting a full and representative set of potentially important areas is critical in developing your customer feedback survey. Remember that if you don’t include all of the areas that are important to your customer in your “big list”, as I call it, then your survey will provide the wrong feedback. You will simply have the wrong information on what is important to your customers and any action you take on the basis of this information may be flawed.

There are three key sources of potentially important things.

1. Staff

Yes, this is where most customer surveys start their search. “Let’s ask the staff – they talk to our customers every day they will know what’s important to them.”

While this is easy, and fast, it is not necessarily the best place to find attributes that are important to your customers. Like everyone else, your staff have their own set of views and filters, especially if they work in product development. They will often tend to think that what they think is important, i.e. the product feature they have been involved with, is important to customers as well.

It is common that internal company perceptions of which service attributes are important do not match with customer perceptions of what is important. When questions are generated exclusively from in-house material and staff input this can easily lead to a customer survey that asks irrelevant questions and does not capture what really drives customer loyalty.

By all means ask your staff what they think customers care about, but make sure that you also source some ideas from elsewhere.

2. Desk research

Desk research means looking at all of the available information in your business and trying to extract potentially important ideas from it. Think about all of the existing customer feedback processes, complaint data, market research, product development input, etc, that you have in the organisation, and get it out.

Review the information to see if you can identify any themes that might be important to customers and add them to your list.

Also, look at on-line and at the academic research to see if you can find useful references that can also be used. Access to this information is now easier than ever so make sure that you use it.

3. Customers

Lastly, ask you customers. Obvious isn’t it really, but few organisations take this last critical step.

The most effective approach is to perform qualitative interviews of a representative sample of your customers. You can do this either face to face or over the telephone.

Interviews will generally last between 30 and 60 minutes and, if done properly, will generate a range of feedback for the “potentially important” attribute process.

How you perform the interviews is also important. You need to be as open with your questions as possible and not lead customers responses.

We often use the Convergent Interview technique when performing these interviews. It allows a relatively open starting point and reduces the chances that you will miss a key potentially important area.

When performing these interviews we find that the face to face approach works very well. After about 15 interviews per customer segment, the number of new themes coming from the interview process falls dramatically. At that point we can bring together the data into series of themes, key points or potentially important areas for use in the survey process.

So now after looking at these three sources you should have a good, broad list set of potentially important attributes. This then is the source material for generating the customer survey questions.

If you take this approach to the development of your survey questions the chances of missing an important driver of customer loyalty is substantially reduced and the success of your survey process improved.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »
Innovation is not just a Product Game; it’s also a Service Game

Innovation is not just a Product Game; it’s also a Service Game

The quality-versus-quantity strategic debate is decades old and still doesn't have a one-size-fits-all answer. But there's one decision rule the winners all follow: pick a position and be ruthless about it. Wolters Kluwer's CX regional manager Janine Scott on why service innovation matters as much as product innovation, and how to choose between the two paths.

How Do You Show Customers What You’re Doing with Their Feedback? [Video]

How Do You Show Customers What You’re Doing with Their Feedback? [Video]

Once customers have given you feedback, they want to see something happen — and most companies quietly skip that loop. Closing it the right way doesn't just increase loyalty; it lifts the response rate next time too. Here's a short video on how to show customers you've heard and acted, with the B2B and B2C variants laid out.

Five things to do right now that will drive more value from customer feedback

Five things to do right now that will drive more value from customer feedback

Aberdeen's 2012 Customer Feedback Management report draws the obvious conclusions about successful versus laggard companies — and a meta-analysis of the same data quietly says something more useful. The biggest differences aren't about collecting feedback. They're about what successful firms do with it. Here are the five specific moves the leaders make that the laggards don't.

Are you stuck on the delight the customer merry-go-round?

Are you stuck on the delight the customer merry-go-round?

Customer-delight programs feel right and are nearly impossible to make repeatable. The HBR research "Stop trying to delight your customers" puts a number on it: making business easy beats delighting at building loyalty. Here's what that research actually found, why Transactional NPS beats Customer Effort Score for capturing the same signal, and how to run the survey at scale without drowning.