Crazy Domains and Buffer, their PR Responses: The Pain and The Glory

Net Promoter FailureIf you have a social media bone in your body you will know about the recent hack of Buffer. You may also have seen or experienced its response, I know I did.

In my opinion, and many others, Buffer did a stellar job in responding to a major issue. Almost as if to counter point Buffer’s success, internet hosting company Crazy Domains’ response to recent network outages shows how not to respond.

What Happened at Buffer and Crazy Domains

“Buffer has been hacked” – that’s not me being overly dramatic. That’s the subject line in an email they sent one hour after the incident took place. From my understanding a hacker was able to post to Twitter and Facebook using the Buffer credentials.

[Read more…]

The 3 Important Differences: Qualitative vs. Quantitative Analysis

bigstock-Brawl-2670840It’s Tuesday afternoon and you’ve just been handed a stack of customer feedback forms with a wealth of information and data to go through and analyse before Friday. You look at the forms; there are numbers, scales, and paragraphs upon paragraphs of commentary.

You pause for a moment and breathe. Where do you begin? What can you even do with all that information?

You want to get the best analysis possible – so the question is – Qualitative Analysis and Quantitative Analysis – which one is better?  Which will provide the best results?

[Read more…]

How Kmart knows you’re pregnant before your family does

This is a fascinating insight into the state of the art in triggered and reactive marketing. In a longish, but very good article, the New York Times provides some great case study material on how Target in the US identifies and targets, no pun intended, women who are pregnant BEFORE they buy any pregnancy related goods or services. With this head start on the competition they are able to generate excellent returns on their marketing.

Do you know any companies working at this level of sophistication? Let me know.

Here is the full article: How Companies Learn Your Secrets

 

[ssba]

Do Your Customer Experience Initiatives Have These Flaws?

It seems to me that many customer experience initiatives are deeply flawed. They start out well intentioned but lack the right process improvement mindset to drive long term change.

The customer experience strategy that seems to be best practice at the moment is:

  1. Do some research on what people want: ask a focus group, run a survey, etc,
  2. Design “the best” customer experience based on the research.
  3. Test it in a limited way –asking people what they think, doing some usability testing (i.e. watching what people actually do either actually or via analytics) of your systems.
  4. Roll-it out.
  5. Relax

The critical part is that the design process (steps 1 and 2)  is run only once. Then, having agreed that it is perfect, just let it run. This is wrong. [Read more…]

Forecasting customer value when you don’t have a contract: Discrete transactions

This post is one in a series in which I summarize into actionable steps parts of the substantial body of work by Peter Fader, Bruce Hardie, et. al. in the analysis of customer bases. The relevant source papers are referenced at the end of the post.

In this post, we will focus on the bottom left quadrant of the Fader/Hardie customer relationship map (as I will refer to it). We will be examining situations where there is no on-going contract between the supplier and the customer and where the customer can only purchase at discrete time intervals.
[Read more…]